A teacher therefore acts as a buffer or interpreter, deciding just what their pupils are prepared to know

A teacher therefore acts as a buffer or interpreter, deciding just what their pupils are prepared to know

A teacher therefore acts as a buffer or interpreter, deciding just what their pupils are prepared to know. A teacher may additionally opt to be very strategic, hiding some expectations from their pupils and showing them short-cuts in order to get the very best marks possible. This may be specially obvious under time pressure or near exams. As an example, a teacher might really value awareness of detail and emphasise the need to learn the correct spelling of key terminology. Nonetheless, many exam papers usually do not allocate marks to spelling provided that the examiner is able to determine what word had been intended. You can find even situations, as an example in GCSE English, where one of many papers has marks for spelling and also the other will not. a strategic teacher could therefore maximise marks for his or her pupils by revealing this aspect of the hidden curriculum while finding your way through particular papers, nonetheless it is counter-productive compared to that teacher’s own private expectations to reveal the lower value provided to spelling prematurily . into the school year.

Finally, the method that you feel about the positives or negatives of a hidden curriculum will mainly be determined by your political views. The notion of a hidden curriculum has its roots in Marxist philosophies, where a hidden curriculum is practically completely negative because it is an underhand way to force young ones into learning how to be compliant and passive employees later on. If you trust this view, then you might desire to expose a number of the hidden curriculum to your pupils to simply help them avoid becoming wage slaves – teaching them just how to ‘play the game’ in assessments might therefore be observed as being a liberating act. Conversely, you could believe that since society covers education it has a moral directly to set the agenda for how a next generation will act in terms of citizenship and their place in society.

just What methods can we use to minimise negative hidden curriculums in teaching practice?

one of many defining top features of a hidden curriculum is not only that there was some sort of a secret agenda, but that numerous of this intentions, values or expectations in a hidden curriculum can not be made explicit – there is something intangible about them that can not be placed into words. Demonstrably, this can not at all times function as situation, and another simple strategy is for teachers to critically evaluate and think on their practice so that they can be much more honest with pupils by making just as much as they are able to explicit. Nonetheless, wanting to be explicit about many values or expectations could risk over-simplifying or creating confusion.

Addressing the hidden curriculum outside of assessment can be more problematic as the hidden curriculum could permeate plenty areas of what we do with your pupils. More over, many areas of the hidden curriculum are ideal for the smooth running of schools. The Marxist critique of hidden curriculums creating compliant ‘wage slaves’ is obviously unwelcome, but a completely laissez-faire approach would be chaos inside our classrooms. We would even question exactly how appropriate it really is for a teacher to expose areas of the hidden curriculum as maybe it’s interpreted as subversive behaviour. Possibly the most readily useful defence contrary to the negative areas of a hidden curriculum is just a strong foundation of critical thinking and self-reflection skills, enabling pupils to believe for themselves how they are now being persuaded to behave in some methods. Equally, you could believe that your house as being a teacher just isn’t to encourage pupils to question authority but alternatively to bolster the values that you simply consented to once you qualified.how to write a biology lab report essay template


The wide-reaching role schools play in society implies that every little thing teachers and pupils do is imbued with hidden meanings and intentions. The thought of a hidden curriculum helps us to see what a few ideas we have been putting across to your learners, and think on whether these are appropriate. Schools prepare young ones to enter the workforce and society generally speaking, so a school is frequently viewed as a safe room to look at the expectations and explore the boundaries.

The notion of a hidden curriculum also exposes a number of the flaws inside our assessment system and how challenging it could be to simply help pupils determine what is expected of those. Reflecting regarding the hidden curriculum should allow you to think of whether you might be helping pupils to produce new skills and abilities or whether you might be helping them to pass an assessment of the skills and abilities. The stark reality is probably somewhere at the center, and this too is just a kind of hidden curriculum even as we try to better understand how each individual pupil experiences the institution curriculum in its broadest sense.


Becker, H., Geer, B., and Hughes, E. (1968). Making the Grade. London: Transaction.

Jackson, P. (1968). Life in Classrooms. Ny: Holt, Rinehart and Winston.

Marton, F. & Säljö, R. (1976). On Qualitative Differences on Learning: I – Outcome and Process. British Journal of Educational Psychology, 46, 4-11.

Richardson, M., Abraham, C., and Bond, R. (2012). Psychological correlates of university students’ scholastic performance: a systematic review and meta-analysis, Psychological Bulletin 138(2), 353-387.

Sambell, K. and McDowell, L. (1998). The construction of this hidden curriculum: messages and meanings into the assessment of student learning, Assessment and Evaluation in degree, 23(4), 391-402.

Snyder, B. (1971). The Hidden Curriculum. Ny: Alfred A. Knopf.


To export a mention of the this article please select a referencing style below:

Other Courses

We’ve received widespread press coverage since 2003

Your UKEssays purchase is safe so we’re rated 4.4/5 on reviews.co.uk

All work is written to order. No plagiarism, guaranteed in full!

We’re here to answer any questions you have got about our services

Copyright © 2003 – 2020 – UKEssays is just a trading name of All Answers Ltd, company registered in England and Wales. Company Registration No: 4964706. VAT Registration No: 842417633. Registered Data Controller No: Z1821391. Registered office: Venture House, Cross Street, Arnold, Nottingham, Nottinghamshire, NG5 7PJ.

*You also can browse our support articles here >

Welcome to chapter 2 for the ‘Inclusion’ module. This chapter will begin from the beginning of this notion, speaking about just what Inclusion happens to be. Having a strong comprehension of why inclusion is very important, and just what constitutes inclusion, could be the first rung on the ladder to building it into your teaching practice.

Goals because of this part

Objectives because of this part

Begin the Lecture

Other Courses

We’ve received widespread press coverage since 2003

Your UKEssays purchase is safe so we’re rated 4.4/5 on reviews.co.uk

All work is written to order. No plagiarism, guaranteed in full!

We’re here to answer any questions you have got about our services

Copyright © 2003 – 2020 – UKEssays is just a trading name of All Answers Ltd, company registered in England and Wales. Company Registration No: 4964706. VAT Registration No: 842417633. Registered Data Controller No: Z1821391. Registered office: Venture House, Cross Street, Arnold, Nottingham, Nottinghamshire, NG5 7PJ.

*You also can browse our support articles here >

Learning Objectives because of this chapter

By the end with this chapter, you want you:

what exactly is Pragmatism?

By nature, pragmatists are pluralists – they think that there are many different realities, with every person trying to find truth and finding meaning in life in accordance with their experiences. They destination a great deal of emphasis upon change, targeting the fact the entire world is just a work in progress, a reality that is in a consistent state of flux. They believe in utilitarian principles – the greatest good for the maximum number, as well as the fulfilment and meeting of peoples need.Pragmatists rely on experimentation, placing more importance regarding the notion of being active in learning, giving more credence to actions than a few ideas (Educational System, 2013). Pragmatists judge something to be good if it offers achieved just what it attempt to do; really, pragmatism can be an approach towards successfully “”… getting things done”” (Talisse and Aikin, 2008, p. 1).

Pragmatism developed as being a approach into the 19th century with the task of CS Peirce, William James and John Dewey, who’re often referred to as the ‘classical’ pragmatists. Despite having different views on a selection of different dilemmas, they will have common themes which are empiricist into the broadest sense, although they reject much of the emotional photo that is connected to empiricism (Godfrey-Smith, 2015). They focused upon the links between a individual experience and their thoughts in terms of actions. To all or any intents and purposes, pragmatists usually do not rely on the notion there are a collection of foundational opinions which underpin all others. They would rather assess values and types of inquiry in light of these usefulness in achieving set goals and/or their consequences.

how can it connect with Education?

in terms of the pragmatist is worried, activity could be the cornerstone of this educative process. They adopt an attitude comparable to Constructivist thinkers such as for example Piaget and Vygotsky who think that children acquire their own knowledge by way of a means of experimentation in, and discussion making use of their environment (Moore, 2000). Pragmatists regard every activity and discussion within the educative process, which by prerequisite involves a consistent restructuring of the experiences so that you can apply them to different circumstances, thus forming new habits (Kivenen and Ristela, 2003). Pragmatists maintain that as society changes and people mature, their views and their experiences will alter their existing knowledge and so their prospective actions later on. It is imperative to them that problem-solving are at the core of all of the education, making the educative process empirical and experimental in nature (Educational System, 2013).

in terms of education is worried, there are numerous implications which result from a pragmatic stance. Pragmatists think that education must be an ever-evolving means of reviewing, reconstructing and integrating their experiences as individuals move through life. That being said, pragmatists hold the view it is essential to keep up the culture of this past within societies whilst tackling the situations which occur in the present and to merge the two. Experimentation and real-life experiences support the key to real knowledge, in that these activities result in growth and change in individuals along with the societies in which they live. The little one and their needs must be at the centre of this educative process as they need to have the freedom to see their certain inherent abilities and their prospective, which is often supported and developed through their schooling.

The parallels aided by the views of Vygotsky can be noticed in the pragmatists’ views of education as being a social process. As being a results of being sociable, people are able to gain more knowledge through interacting with whomever is in their environment, or the environmental surroundings itself, to create progress. It really is believed that the social process will cause the development of attitudes and feelings which are acceptable to society most importantly which will enable individuals to simply take their destination and ‘fit in’ joyfully later on. Nonetheless, it is a process which continues throughout life as a result of individuals continually reflecting upon their experiences and adjusting their attitudes and actions, in addition to developing their personality. In terms of this approach is worried, there really should not be any certain preconceived aims and objectives within education – the direction and aims of any educative provision should take line aided by the child’s experience. Pragmatists think that knowledge is one collective product, leaving these with the need to create a curriculum that is dynamic and flexible towards the level that young ones are able to develop problem-solving skills and conform to the constantly changing world around them (Educational System, 2013; Sankaranarayanan and Sindhu, 2012).

Pragmatists support the view that education must be ‘learning by doing’. It should therefore be grounded in children’s experiences in addition to different activities and preparation for his or her future everyday lives. It really is their view that as well as school subjects, time must be afforded to young ones to engage in free, meaningful social discussion within the curriculum (Shawal, 2016). The little one are at the centre of this educative process – their needs, their interests and aspirations. Which means the approaches adopted for teaching is both flexible and dynamic towards the level they can be modified to take care of the material, along with the needs and abilities of this young ones. This sort of approach towards education sees practitioners adopting the role of a friend and guide, who is alert to the interests of individual young ones, in addition to having a knowledge of this changing nature of society (Witzky, n.d.; Shawal, 2016). Teachers provide dilemmas for his or her pupils which are built to stimulate and attract them, aided by the expectation which they find methods to them, either as individuals or in groups (Educational System, 2013; Whitzky, n.d.). The big event of all of the educators is always to behave as a facilitator with regards to the actions and materials, to ensure that the youngsters are able to have a meaningful educational experience. Teachers also act as a resource in their own right and help to guide students into the right direction.

skills and limits

A number of criticisms were levelled at the notion of pragmatism. As an example, the fact this philosophy will not espouse any absolute requirements is viewed as a limitation. In accordance with pragmatists, truth changes in accordance with circumstances, times and places and that truths are manufactured as being a results of our experiences. These values can result in corruption and vice within society, as over-arching values and requirements of moral behaviour create cohesion within society, along with them the capacity to evaluate conduct within society. It really is noticeable that pragmatists would not have any form of spiritual values, aided by the philosophy advocating an even more extreme type of utilitarianism (Shawal, 2016). an absence of spiritual values and some kind of moral code can cause conflict and disharmony; whilst it really is true that peoples values change as societies change, it’s important for the upkeep of law and order that there is a pair of common values to call home by. This rejection of spiritual values and a moral code is reflected in a pragmatists belief that people should only concentrate upon today’s together with future as opposed to dwelling upon yesteryear (Educational System, 2013).

with regards to education, the fact that pragmatists set no predetermined aims for education could possibly be viewed as a serious flaw. If there are no aims and objectives attached to the educative process, exactly how is success to be assessed and/or examined? How do planning of activities to re capture the interest of young ones be accomplished? Additionally it is extremely tough to make a curriculum where all knowledge could be gained from life experiences. Devising and picking project work to attain a holistic curriculum is incredibly difficult (Educational System, 2013) – besides the dilemma of planning, practitioners on their own may possibly not be able to deal with the demands with this approach towards teaching and learning as a result of being forced to act in a supervisory ability rather than a primary purveyor of information (Neeraja, 2003).

The skills of pragmatism lie in its view that the little one must be at the centre of this educative process. They focus upon the notion that children develop as individuals due to their particular efforts, in relation to their experiences and their discussion aided by the environment and people around them. Young ones are actively encouraged to activate along with their learning through problem-solving and addressing projects which permits them to explore and see things employing their imagination and creativity. a pragmatic education is a practical education, in that it prepares young ones extremely effortlessly money for hard times everyday lives. Additionally it is an education that stresses democratic values and collective obligation which they believe permits individuals to produce skills, attributes and faculties that may easily fit into well with society most importantly (Educational System, 2013).

Links to apply

Dewey’s increased exposure of educating the whole son or daughter led him to be viewed as “”… the father of Progressive education”” (State University.com, n.d., para 2). Progressivists support the view that education’s sole focus must be regarding the whole youngster as opposed towards the teacher or the information of this curriculum. This sort of philosophy stresses the need for students to check a few ideas through active experimentation and that learning is started upon the questions that learners encounter through experiencing the world. It is an active as opposed to a passive process (Cohen, 1999). You should remember that Dewey’s writings and philosophy of education move one step away from dogmatic Pragmatism, in that he joined the a few ideas of thinking and doing [the cognitive and also the kinaesthetic] (State University.com, n.d.) as an element of the process of learning and making progress, rather than the notion that knowledge could possibly be repeated towards the level that its application became habitual. The amalgam of those differing views aided Progressives to produce a philosophy of education which enables young ones to know the connection between thought and action makes it possible for them the opportunity to be involved in a democratic society when they reach maturity (State University.com, n.d.).

The influence of experiential learning is seen through the entire educative system in the Western world, specially inside the great britain. The notions of experiential learning as well as its importance to kids’ development is seen into the Early Years Foundation Stage [EYFS] (Department of Education [DfE], 2014) framework which places young ones in the middle for the learning process. The emphasis is on experiential learning through play, the origins of which is often traced back once again to Isaacs (1932), Montessori (1966) as well as the Developmentally Appropriate Practice Approach (Bredekamp and Copple, 1997). The EYFS acknowledges the need for every youngster to be in receipt of individual treatment through the creation of an environment which gives for his or her personal needs whilst helping them to produce socially through positive relationships. This encourages them to notice their capabilities and facilitates the development into self-confident folks who are able to interact with others within their learning. The National Curriculum (DfE, 2014a) also places significant amounts of emphasis upon young ones gaining experience through participating in authentic problem-solving activities. So that you can give kids’ holistic development, primary schools usually take part in project work which draws together different subject areas, whilst placing an increased exposure of both literacy and numeracy. It really is within Key Stages 1 and 2 that there is most evidence of experiential learning, although secondary school education provides opportunities for young ones to activate with active learning through experimentation in science classes plus in problem-solving across a number of different subjects.


Dewey’s impact on education should not be underestimated. His some ideas about experiential education have ensured that generations of learners were given skills for life plus an enthusiasm for learning which runs throughout their everyday lives. Maybe it’s argued that his vision has opened a vast selection of different learning opportunities from young ones into the class room, to adults on the job, most of which are in relation to life experiences.

Select bibliography

Bredekamp, S., Copple, C. (1997) Developmentally Appropriate Practice in Early Childhood Products. (Revised Edition) Washington: National Association for the Education of small children

Bruce, T. (2004) Developing Learning in Early Childhood. London: Sage

Bruce, T. (1996) Helping Young Children to Play. London: Hodder & Stoughton

Cohen, L. M. (1999) ‘Section III – Philosophical Perspectives in Education.’ Retrieved 12th January 2017 from http://oregonstate.edu/instruction/ed416/PP3.html

Department for Education (2014) Statutory Framework for the Early Years Foundation Stage: Setting the standards for learning, development and care for young ones from birth to five. London: Department for Education

Department for Education (2014a) The National Curriculum in England. Framework Document. London: Department for Educaation

Godfrey-Smith, P. (2015) ‘Pragmatism: Philosophical Aspects.’ Wright, J. (Ed) (2nd Ed) Overseas Encyclopedia of this social and behavioural sciences Vol. 18 Oxford: Elsevier pp. 803 – 807

Groves, L., McNish, H. (2008) Baseline Study of Play as Merrylee Primary School, Glasgow. Forestry Commission Scotland

Hughes, B. (2006) Playtypes: Speculations and Possibilities. London: London Centre for Playwork Education and Training

Isaacs, S. (1932) The Nursery Years your head for the youngster from Birth to Six Years. London: Routledge and Kegan Paul

Kivenen, O., Ristela, P. (2003) ‘From Constructivism to a Pragmatist Conception of Learning.’ Oxford report on Education Vol. 29, number 3, pp. 363 – 375

Kolb, D. A. (1984) Experiential Learning: Experience as being a way to obtain Learning and Development. Englewood Cliffs, Nj: Prentice-Hall

Montessori, M. (1966) The Trick of Childhood. Ny: Ballantine Books

Moore, A. (2000) Teaching and Learning: Pedagogy, Curriculum and society. London: Routledge

Neeraja, K. P. (2003) Textbook of Nursing Education. New Delhi: Jaypee Brothers Healthcare Publishers Ltd

Nilson, L. B. (2010) Teaching At Its Most Readily Useful: A Research-Based Resource for College Instructors. (3rd Ed) San Francisco Bay Area, CA: Jossey-Bass

Northern Illinois University (n.d.) ‘Experiential learning.’ Retrieved 11th January 2017 from http://www.niu.edu/facdev/_pdf/guide/strategies/experiential_learning.pdf

O’Brien, L., Murray, R. (2005) ‘Forest schools in England and Wales: Woodland room to understand and grow.’ Environmental Education Autumn, pp. 25 – 27

Rae, L. (1997) Planning and Designing Training Programmes. Aldershot: Gower Publishing Ltd

Riley, K. (2007) ‘Re-connecting using the natural environment – forest schools in Sussex.’ Environmental Education Spring, p. 7

Sankaranarayanan, B., Sindhu, B. (2012) Learning and Teaching Nursing. (4th Ed) New Delhi: Jaypee Brothers Healthcare Publishers Ltd

Sayeed, Z., Guerin, E. (2000) Early Years Play: A Pleased Medium for Assessment and Intervention. London: David Fulton

Shawal, M. (2017) ‘Pragmatism in Education: Study Notes.’ Retrieved 12th January 2017 from http://www.yourarticlelibrary.com/education/pragmatism-in-education-study-notes/69152/

State University.com (n.d.) ‘Progressive Education – Philosophical Foundations, Pedagogical Progressivism, Administrative Progressivism, Life-Adjustment Progressivism.’ Retrieved 12th January 2017 from http://education.stateuniversity.com/pages/2336/Progressive-Education.html

Talisse, R. B., Aikin, S. F. (2008) Pragmatism: A Guide for the Perplexed. London: Continuum Overseas Publishing Group

Vocabulary.com (n.d.) ‘Pragmatic.’ Retrieved 11th January https://www.vocabulary.com/dictionary/pragmatic

Witzky, A. (n.d.) ‘Pragmatism in Education.’ PowerPoint presentation – edu-513. Retrieved 12th January from https://edu.513.wikispaces.com/file/view/Pragmatism+in+Education.ppt


To export a mention of the this article please select a referencing style below:

Other Courses

We’ve received widespread press coverage since 2003

Your UKEssays purchase is safe so we’re rated 4.4/5 on reviews.co.uk

All work is written to order. No plagiarism, guaranteed in full!

We’re here to answer any questions you have got about our services

Copyright © 2003 – 2020 – UKEssays is just a trading name of All Answers Ltd, company registered in England and Wales. Company Registration No: 4964706. VAT Registration No: 842417633. Registered Data Controller No: Z1821391. Registered office: Venture House, Cross Street, Arnold, Nottingham, Nottinghamshire, NG5 7PJ.

*You also can browse our support articles here >

Learning objectives because of this chapter:

By the end with this chapter, you ought to able to:

just what is a national curriculum?

depending on a 2009 UK parliamentary committee report, a national curriculum “”sets out the human anatomy of knowledge, skills and comprehending that a society desires to pass on to its young ones and teenagers”” (House of Commons, 2009). National curricula give you a broad pair of subjects and cover every one of the several years of compulsory education in the united states concerned. The national curriculum will also indicate the minimum level of attainment to be targeted as well as the requirements young ones are anticipated to attain into the subjects studied. National curricula may also state the staging points at which young ones are tested, when formal examinations will take place for qualification purposes.

The National Curriculum in England

The institution curriculum has elements which are considered area of the National Curriculum, and also other elements which lay outside of the mandated provision, but which are nonetheless compulsory. Schools in England, as an example, are anticipated to deliver religious education throughout compulsory schooling years, and sex and relationships education from year 7 (age 11, or the beginning of secondary school) onwards. Though schools must make provision for religious education, parents/carers can elect to have their child opt out of such lessons on faith grounds; young ones are often excused from some areas of sex and relationship education in the same grounds (UK Government, 2015).   

In England, the National Curriculum is arranged with regards to clusters of scholastic years, into elements which are called key stages:

Ages 3-5: Preschool and reception: early years curriculum

Ages 5-7: Years 1 and 2 primary school: Key Stage 1 (with national screening and teacher assessments in English, maths and science in Year 2)  

Ages 7-10: Years 3-6 primary school: Key Stage 2 (with national screening and teacher assessments in English, maths and science in Year 6)

Ages 11-14: Years 7-9 secondary school: Key Stage 3

Ages 15-16: Years 10-11 secondary school: Key Stage 4 (some young ones will require some GCSEs in Year 10, though all will require the bulk/all GCSEs or other national qualifications in Year 11).

16, or Year 11, could be the national school-leaving age in great britain. Nonetheless, the overwhelming majority of teenagers continue into some kind of further education, following either a vocational route leading to level 3 vocational qualifications, or a scholastic route having A levels as being a prospective precursor degree (UK Government, 2016).

With respect to curricular arrangements in the UK, you can find attempts to give two broad sets of aims which were developed from the 1996 Education Act, which needed that all schools that have been operating into the state sector were to deliver an education that has been both balanced and broad, and also satisfy two other sets of aims. In the first instance, the curriculum would have to promote development of young ones and teenagers with respect to their spiritual, cultural, moral, mental, and physical development, also to that of wider society, plus in the next instance, to create adequate preparation for his or her emergence into adult life (Department for Education, 2007).

exactly How are national curricula developed?

National curricula tend to evolve with time. A feature of prescription into the subjects to be covered in compulsory education dates towards the 1870 Elementary Education Act, which established the principle of mandatory elementary education for all young ones; ahead of 1870, education had been only offered to those that could manage it (Gillard, 2011). Though a fully-available basic education took very nearly 2 full decades to be universally-available, this is however the kick off point for the National Curriculum, in that state oversight of education for several had been initiated.

By the mid-1980s, a consensus in government had been growing for the establishment of a national curriculum. This is driven by way of a group of concerns: low requirements being evident in secondary education wide ranges in quality between different schools, perceptions of weaknesses in curriculum design plus in the implementation of such planning documents, and overly-subjective assessment of pupil ability (Faulkner, 2009). The 1988 Education Reform Act had been the car by which the first iteration of this National Curriculum had been established. The Act had three main aims, as well as the National Curriculum had been the key means by which these aims is addressed. The aims were:

The 1988 Act not only introduced the National Curriculum, but at the same time required that responsibility for making sure the National Curriculum had been delivered faithfully had been placed with regional authorities, with school governors, along with school heads (rather than with central government).

One hand, the inauguration of centralised curricular arrangement might be observed to be always a unifying force, driven by the perception that requirements needed in addition raising, equalizing, and standardising. On the other hand, contemporary drivers towards schools becoming independent from regional authority control, first in administrative contexts, after which within their curricular arrangements, have told a maybe different story. To some extent, it could be argued, the National Curriculum acts as a restrictive force on those schools electing to keep under regional authority control, with those institutions operating in more of a free market context being allowed to have greater flexibility over their curricular arrangements.

exactly How closely do individual institutions need certainly to abide by the national curriculum?

The National Curriculum will not connect with all schools equally. Education has changed into a devolved matter for national assemblies and similar kinds of regional government in Scotland, Wales, and Northern Ireland considering that the inception of national curriculum arrangements into the late 1980s in britain.